Sign in to FlowVella

Forgot password?
Sign in with Facebook

New? Create your account

Sign up for FlowVella

Sign up with Facebook

Already have an account? Sign in now


By registering you are agreeing to our
Terms of Service

Share This Flow

Loading Flow

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

6. Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

b. Sapir-Whorf hypothesis:

i. “No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same world with different labels attached” (Edward Sapir, 1929.)

ii. “Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think about” (Benjamin Lee Whorf, 1956.)

c. Strong and weak versions of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis:

i. Strong (linguistic determinism.)

ii. Weak (linguistic relativity.)

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...
  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10

  • 11

  • 12

  • 13

  • 14

  • 15

  • 16

  • 17

  • 18

  • 19

  • 20

  • 21

  • 22

  • 23

  • 24

(RE224) Lecture 14

By RE224: Gendering the Divine