Sign up for FlowVella
Sign up with FacebookAlready have an account? Sign in now
By registering you are agreeing to our
Terms of Service
Loading Flow
Aims of Ethics for Professional Educators
What educators can expect to do in the way of enhancing moral perception and sensitivity?
- Without moral perception* and sensitivity, moral reasoning* cannot be started.
- We lack moral concepts, commitments, sensitivities, ways of reasoning, etc.
. Well designed courses - cannot change a person (e.g. uncaring-caring, lack of virtue - virtuous)
. Prospective educators are not completely insensitive, uncaring or without virtue.
e.g. act and think differently in different contexts, settings, situations - caring in some and not in another, act honestly and
fairly in one context and not in another.
. Students: learn their moral concepts from restricted range of exemplars - narrow concepts &
unfamiliar with concepts. e.g. bullying - we only know what was pointed out to us.
*Moral perception = Our ability to judge important moral qualities in particular situations
*Moral Reasoning = thinking process with the objective of determining whether an idea is right or wrong.
Group critique:
- Coomb’s article does not address his own concerns about ethical problems - unresolved tension among incompatible priorities in ethical decision-making that rival theories provide.
- No explanation - how participants in professional ethics courses would assess the reasons for new moral concepts