Sign in to FlowVella

Forgot password?
Sign in with Facebook

New? Create your account

Sign up for FlowVella

Sign up with Facebook

Already have an account? Sign in now


By registering you are agreeing to our
Terms of Service

Share This Flow

?>

Loading Flow

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Downloading Image /

loading...

Conclusion

Looking at our total data, we accept the null hypothesis and agree that the statistics released from the m&m company is accurate. We say this because, as a class, our chi square value is 4.5, which is far below the limit of 11.07. This makes us accept that the information is accurate. Some individual students (like myself) may have received different results for their own results. This may be due to the random concentration of different colours, as the dispersion of colours in the bag is not necessarily even. This causes some students to have a possibly inaccurate amount of, say, yellow m&ms, which affects the total chi square amount. As a class, however, the results should be uniform when averaged together, and this resulted in the acceptance of the null hypothesis.

Downloading Image /

loading...
  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10

  • 11

  • 12

  • 13

  • 14

  • 15

Chi Square Analysis Flowboard

By Emily Harrison

Chi Square Analysis presentation for AP biology, 4th period.